|
|
Post by Prime Good on Jul 17, 2008 18:31:28 GMT -5
I was wondering this.  (strange thread, I know) Should Futura, Ghost Buggy and Time Hopper be considered "official" members of the 1986 Ghostbusters squad? Futura comes from the future, but she is a Ghostbuster as well. I'm wondering if she can be considered a "temporary member" everytime she meets/joins Jake & company, or just a "Ghostbuster of the future time" working along with our heroes. Time Hopper is her vehicle... but she is sentient and do her "ghostbusting thing" anyway. Ghost Buggy is a "living" being, and an equipped ghostbusting vehicle... should it be considered part of the roster, or just "their vehicle"?  |
|
Apparitia
Ghost Buster
Our Beloved Ghost-Girl
Sorry in advance for delayed responses.
Posts: 150
|
Post by Apparitia on Jul 18, 2008 11:48:41 GMT -5
When I hear or read "Ghostbusters" I usually think of Jake, Eddie and Tracy. Of course Futura is a Ghostbuster too, but from the future and not from the regular time. Ghost Buggy and Time Hopper just support them as their vehicles. This was my opinion before this thread. I'm not sure if it's correct at all...  Ghost Buggy was even made as a wax figure together with the Ghostbusters. |
|
Scuotiossa
Poltergeist 
Italian Android Spectre
Do not confuse with C-3PO
Posts: 317
|
Post by Scuotiossa on Jul 18, 2008 14:37:44 GMT -5
Futura in my opinion can be considered one of them ... He had the fragment of the stone tablet, knew them and was always contacted them with a confidential tone ... Knowing the values of jake, Eddie and Tracy, undoubtedly consider her one of them ...
|
|
|
|
Post by jackkongthird on Jul 22, 2008 7:29:05 GMT -5
no, no, to me it's just a trio, futura is cool but she is a supporting character and the first ghostbusting female, that's it. leave the vehicles alone, also  |
|
Scuotiossa
Poltergeist
Italian Android Spectre
Do not confuse with C-3PO
Posts: 317
|
Post by Scuotiossa on Jul 22, 2008 8:15:08 GMT -5
In my opinion, all are part of a group winner ... Unable to think of one without the other...
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime Good on Jul 22, 2008 11:13:32 GMT -5
In my opinion, all are part of a group winner ... Unable to think of one without the other... I tend to agree with you. That's why I opened this thread. I feel like Futura belongs to them on a deeper level. And yes, in part I agree with Jake Kong Third, the vehicles are just that: (talking and sentient) vehicles. ;D |
|
trogdor
Kong's Apprentice
Posts: 74
|
Post by trogdor on Aug 3, 2008 16:48:06 GMT -5
Did not GB have a thing for Futura?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zack on Aug 3, 2008 21:55:09 GMT -5
GB had a thing for Time Hopper  |
|
trogdor
Kong's Apprentice
Posts: 74
|
Post by trogdor on Aug 4, 2008 0:57:23 GMT -5
GB had a thing for Time Hopper Naw, I think he had a thing for Futura. |
|
|
|
Post by Prime Good on Aug 4, 2008 10:06:04 GMT -5
GB had a thing for Time Hopper Naw, I think he had a thing for Futura. NAW, I can sure you that GB (Ghost Buggy?) was trying to romanticize its life with the Time Hopper. ;D |
|
